The Personality Traits In Ethical Leadership Management Essay

The Personality Traits In Ethical leading Management EssayEthical leading is mostly whatever leading integrity. This statement has triggered much controversy and is widely discussed. According to Ciulla (2004), Philosophers views honor subject lead, as how the honest leadership should be live with like. Leadership integrity of a leader is sh take through the consistency of values, aims and doings (Bloskie 1995). Leadership is defined by (Wiess 2003) as a sh ard process, although the values and behaviors of company founders and CEOs often frame and typeset the cultural tone for organization. One expression to recognize a leaders value is through the vision and mission statement of a company.The constitution traits in honorable leaders include integrity, swearworthiness, honesty and forthrightness or candor (Trevino et al. 2000).(Trevino brownish 2004) argues that statement as a myth and argued that the reportage of honourable leaders was too vague as it entirely grueling solely on individuals character and qualities such as integrity, honesty and fairness. juvenile research shows the qualities of a somebody contri nonwithstandinges to the establishment of estimable leadership tho it is non substantial to establish an effective honest leadership (Trevino Brown 2004). Therefore, in this essay I bequeath touch on the good concepts and theories, and the occurrence of leadership and the dimensions that is related to honest leadership and it will and so bring slightly a better understanding of whether is honest leadership is mostly ab give away leadership integrity.With much good scandals evidently actual in most organization, it is comes to show that ethical dimensions is crucial to explain what is ethical leadership.What is Ethical leadership?Studies were conducted by Brown, Trevino Harrison to understand the qualities that is linked to ethical leadership. fanny on the interview that they held during 2002, they defined ethi cal leadership as a display of normatively appropriate conduct through individual activity and inter mortalal relationships, and the promotion of such conduct to chase through two way interaction, reinforcement and decision-making ( Brown et al., 2005).Figure 1 The matrix of incorrupt individual and lesson manager dimension (Trevino, Hartman Brown 200)Unethical leadership musical modeHypocritical leadershipLeaders who passes down influential ethical messages across to the followers(who are ethical manager) save who is recognized to be ethical themselves (they are not ethical somebodys) are referred to as hypocritical leaders as shown in figure 1. Hypocritical focussing are about ethical pretense. The problem is that by giving much emphasiz to reliability only put forward objectives of ethical problem. If a leader talks about integrity and ethical values all time barely doesnt nonplus by it, followers cant place trust in the leader because he damp to do what do say.Ethica lly silent leadershipThe last confederacy is call the legally quiet authority. It relates to leader does not belong to each strong ethical nor strong ethical zone. They may be ethical person but their stand is not clear. They dont provide obvious leadership in terms of ethics. It may be due to the leader has no aware(predicate)ness on how important is ethical leadership relates to organization ethical goal, or they simply unspoilt do not care about ethical issues.Ethical leadership styleTo establish a estimable ethical leadership successfully, it requires the executive to display the qualities of a moral person as well as a moral manager. It is natural for a leader to possess characteristics of integrity and also to be able to inform this quality into some others in the organization. As a leader, they portray images of a region model to others in the organization, so if they set guidelines for employee to oblige by but leaders themselves dont bind to it employees develop negative feelings and feel the reluctance to adhere to the guideline. (Trevino et al. 2000) states that an executive essential first be a moral or ethical person or else their followers will come to learn them as hypocrites when their true nature shows. This traits, behavior and decision making characteristics should be transparently evident, or else they may be misinterpreted, and the executive may not be viewed as a moral or ethical person.A leader who is neither a moral person nor a moral manager is an unethical leader. Even if you are a moral person, but it does not make you a moral manager, to be able to able strike a balance between both moral person and manager, you will need show your followers how well you support and encourage companys ethics and values to your followers. This shows that in order to develop ethical leadership, the executive need to be both a moral person and manager, it whole shebang two way (Brooks Dunn 2009).(Trevino et al. 2000) discovered out tha t these can be fall upond by having transparency in the system, role model qualities must be visualised openly, there should be interaction on a daily rump and persuasively about ethical requirements, principals and value, using the compensation system to aliment all wrenchers responsible to ethical standard. Lets relate this to real life scenario, amaze for example, civil servants who is working for the government should up nominate integrity in them, commonplace has the perceived image that all civil servants are role models to picture up so if they were commit crimes that is against integrity, public will naturally capture them as hypocrites and will lose faith in them as a role model. (Bandura 1986) states that if leaders do not adhere by what they stated in the guidelines, there is no reason why the followers should adhere to it. It is the virtue of a leader will religiously stick to their principles, keeps promises, admits their mistakes and adhere to through on thei r commitments (Bass Bass sounds 2008).Ethical leadership and ethical cultureLeaders can affect cultures in many ways. They can budge culture by s force outing down new values to the followers. What leaders do, say or any actions affects how followers think of the leaders. Clearly, employees are real responsive towards messages send in by leaders. unless they personalisedly do not know who the senior management of the organisation is they can only make sense of it from what they hear. Therefore, leaders has to build a reputation for ethical leadership through transparency on the ethical issue and thence communicating a strong ethic messageOutcomes of ethical relationshipEthical relationships is believed to be important because of the results it is believed to impact. Constant with a social accomplishment surmisal, followers replicate ethical leaders behavior because such management are eye-catching and reliable models who model normatively appropriate behavior. In addition, e thical management conveys the value of ethical requirements and use performance management systems to hold workers responsible for their performance. Employees dont have to know about the benefits and punitive measures straight but according to public social learning concept, they can learn about them by monitoring others result.Social learning theory and ethical leadershipFollowing Brown et al. (2005), we rely on social learning theory ( Bandura, 1997, 1986) to explain outcomes of ethical leadership. Social learning theory serves as a guidance to understand why individual characteristics of ethical leadership and how external cultural factors influences followers perceived image of leader as ethical leader.According to social learning theory, for leaders to be seen as ethical leaders by their followers, they first lead an example that proves that they are safe(p) and trustworthy leaders to their followers. According to (Bandura, 1977,1986) social learning theory describes that f ound on the way individual learn by face uping out for and attempting to work towards the same attitudes, values and behavior of the dependable leader. This is supported by (Kohlberg, 1969 Trevino, 1986) that most individual look up to others for ethical advice or assistance.If you are the CEO, the perceived image as seen by the followers is seen as somebody who has what it on the surface you will be seen as a person who has qualities and credibility basically what it takes to be in that position, therefore the it is the status and mightiness of a person will boost the attractiveness thus resulting in followers interest to look out for ethical leaders behavior (Bandura, 1986).Leaders have the power and authority because their position held is of a higher(prenominal) post as compared to the followers. Not only the status draws attention to the followers, leaders who displays acts of care and concern and giving fair treatments plays a bankrupt in the attention for followers and giv es positive motivations.Studies have shown that encouragement plays an essential part in modelling effectiveness because followers focus on those who controls essential resources and to rewards and punishments. Employees can learn about what is acceptable or undesirable by focusing on how other business members are honoured or develop and control their own answer as a result deprecative view on ethical leadership stylesThere are deuce-ace leadership theories that overlap the ethical leadership domain, Transformational, spiritual and authentic theories of leadership all address the moral potential of leadership in some way.Transformational leadershipBurns (1978) recommended that transformational leadership as moral leadership because the leaders inspire their followers to look beyond self-interest and perform and work towards goals together. Kaungo Mendonca (1996) recommended that transformational authority engaged ethical influence process, while transactional leadership did not. But bass(1985) recommended that transformational control could be ethical or unethical based on their inspiration.Authetic leadershipAuthetic leadership are leaders who are deeply aware of how they think and behave and are perceived by others a be aware of their own and others value/moral perspective, knowledge, and strengths aware of the context in which they operate and are confident, hopeful, optimistic, resilient, and high on moral character (Avolio, luthans walumbwa 2004). Self-awareness, bleakness transparency and consistency made up of authentic leadership. And also universe motivated by good end concepts and issues for others is essential to authentic authority. Authetic leadership are capable of evaluating uncertain ethical issues, watching them from several viewpoints, and aiming choices with their own ethical concepts. Like transformational leadership, authentic leadership seems to overlap with ethical leadership in terms of personal features. apparitional leadership apparitional leadership comprised of the concepts, behaviours and habits that are necessary to motivate ones self and others so that they have a sense of spiritual survival l through contacting and membership (Fry, 2003, p.711) Spiritual leadership has also been described as occurring when a person in a authority place symbolizes spiritual concepts such as reliabililty, loyalty, and humblness, exploitation the self as an example of someone who can be reliable, depended upon and admire. Spiritual leadership is also confirmed through actions, whether in personal revelatory exercise or in ethical, sympathetic, and well-mannered treatment of others, (reave 2005)Thus, ethical leadership is clearly related to, but unique from these leadership concepts. I have described ethical leadership and articulated how it overlaps with, yet is unique from other related theories of authority.ConclusionIn conclusion, I disagree with the statement that ethical leadership is mainly about leadership i ntegrity. Integrity only plays a part in establishment of a reputation leadership it is not sufficient enough as it requires more than just strong personal qualities or virtue. Not only should you have leadership integrity, followers must be led from the leaders on how to be ethical, it is not just enough to be a ethical person who makes good choices, a reputation for ethical leadership requires leaders to continually communicate ethical values to the followers and make sure they abide by it. loser to develop a reputation for leadership, it will mostly likely end up as ethically neutral. Therefore, we can say that communication from the leaders is very crucial, they need to be aware of their actions, what they say, and what they do is constantly viewed from their followers. As mentioned in the social learning theory, in nature followers look up to leaders because they have status and power, if a leader do not abide by the guidelines they set the trust from the followers will be gon e which thus result in followers losing trust and faith in their leaders.You need to be both a moral manager and a moral person in order to achieve a reputable ethical leadership